🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding the comments delivered by ESPN broadcaster Chris Fowler after the Serbian champion's victory over the American player during the US Open quarter-finals. Consider – the athlete represents the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions often encourage nationalism. Some letdown was understandable. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, force of nature the Spanish star was looming in the next round, who he has yet to beat in an competitive encounter. And if he’d somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion the Italian, against whom the American had lost 10 of the last 11 sets. The two young stars had also divided the previous seven major titles (and Alcaraz proceeded to thrash a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz said in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his draw, because it presented the opportunity to beat the top three competitors in the world in succession. He is more than within his right to aim for the accomplishment; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But going into that Serbian last eight match what other person sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?

Coco Gauff’s weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and consistent victories

The American, 28, is ranked fourth in the global rankings entering the upcoming ATP World Tour Finals and has won his last six matches over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could claim that position for himself in the coming years. But evidently that at present, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. His top-class serve and concussive power on each front side and backhand are more than enough to dispose of most rivals on the ATP tour. Against the handful of generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has seen the curious emergence of lanky, towering athletes who can nevertheless move around with the surprising speed and grace of smaller players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His movement is rigid, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the other player was dictating, and playing a soft shot versus him is usually a safe bet. That acts as a pretty harsh limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a several dramatic, improbable improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was hovering around the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he suddenly exploded to fourth place – and held the position. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating legendary figures like Alcaraz, Sinner, and even a declining Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What was Fowler thinking? That Fritz, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was appropriate commenting on the ongoing slump of US male players lifting major titles when Fritz had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the magnitude of the task insufficient.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon semi-finals in July.

The American's performance in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an indication. The Serbian won in four rounds, a victory that only seemed tenuous for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple championship opportunities and had a chance to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous opportunities to break. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the streak to the point of agony. When Fritz eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the main contest and compelled him to expend excessive effort to prevail. Facing set points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to heaven. He prolonged the contest two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, just a result of having to hit too many second serves.

The contest was fairly ironclad proof that Fritz is not good enough to beat any form of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not especially appeared like he believed he could win. This is absolutely acceptable – Djokovic is the best player ever, and may not be at the height of his physical powers now, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The problem is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was had not done anything that indicated he would.

The American is an asset to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a calm, thoughtful voice in press conferences, exceeding almost everyone on the men's tour aside from the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the strategy he believed decided a contest, but explain it. That he should bear the brunt of the blame for the United States not produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the rankings, perhaps they can divide that load.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• The Spanish phenom
• Taylor Fritz (US)
• The Australian speedster
• The Italian stylist

Bjorn Borg Division

• Jannik Sinner (It)
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• The Canadian talent

“I would likely dwell on it indefinitely if I fail to accomplish it,” the American informed a journalist in June of claiming a major. It is hoped he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that goal, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying empire is actually highly improbable for all other players. {