🔗 Share this article

Families of people laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is creating avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being consumed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It causes me distress. My parents intended this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Estimates indicate at least part of one churchyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Along the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving overseas. His parent expressed she could not sleep after learning her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

In her view, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling exasperated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. We are here to help support them through that process with communities.”

He added there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking decades before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. We need good community discussions to find the right solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a doctrine in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.